Italiano
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
Category Archives: Recensioni
95. Review of: Gianluca Bianchi, Lévinas e la difesa dell’interiorità, pref. di Emanuele Felice, Mimesis, Milano-Udine 2019, pp. 148. (Edoardo Poli)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
94. Review of: Donald Hoffman, L’illusione della realtà. Come l’evoluzione ci inganna sul mondo che vediamo, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino 2020, pp. 330. (Guido Di Muccio)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
93. Review of: Andrea Staiti, Etica naturalistica e fenomenologia, il Mulino, Bologna 2020, pp. 158. (Bianca Bellini)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
92. Review of: Anna M. Nieddu, Vinicio Busacchi (a cura di), Pragmatismo ed ermeneutica. Soggettività, storicità, rappresentazione, Mimesis, Milano-Udine 2019, pp. 264. (Riccardo Cravero)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
91. Review of: Francesca Nodari, Temporalità e umanità. La diacronia in Emmanuel Levinas, Giuntina, Firenze 2017, pp. 286. (Edoardo Poli)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
90. Review of: Felice Cimatti, La vita estrinseca. Dopo il linguaggio, Orthotes, Napoli-Salerno 2018, pp. 210. (Tommaso Franci)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
89. Review of: Hannah Arendt, Socrate, Raffaello Cortina, Milano 2015, pp. 124. (Lavinia Peluso)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
88. Review of: Roberto Mordacci, Ritorno a Utopia, Laterza, Roma-Bari 2020, pp. 160. (Federico Maria Angeloro)
Sorry, this entry is only available in Italian. Read More »
87. Review of: Samir Okasha, Philosophy of Biology. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2019, pp. 152. (Claudio Davini)
Despite the opinion of those contemporary scientists who believe philosophy is nothing more than an occupation for tired scientists at the end of their career – what is ungraciously known as the “philosopause” –, many of the greatest philosophers of all time were influenced by the scientific world-views of their day, and some of them, such as Descartes and Leibniz, ... Read More »
