{"id":5494,"date":"2021-06-23T10:47:15","date_gmt":"2021-06-23T08:47:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/?p=5494"},"modified":"2021-06-23T10:49:10","modified_gmt":"2021-06-23T08:49:10","slug":"discipline-filosofiche-xxx-2-2020-il-rinnovamento-dellermeneutica-con-e-oltre-paul-ricoeur-a-cura-di-johann-michel-e-carla-canullo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/ultimi-numeri\/discipline-filosofiche-xxx-2-2020-il-rinnovamento-dellermeneutica-con-e-oltre-paul-ricoeur-a-cura-di-johann-michel-e-carla-canullo\/","title":{"rendered":"Discipline Filosofiche XXX, 2, 2020: The Renewal of Hermeneutics: with Paul Ric\u0153ur and Beyond, edited by Johann Michel and Carla Canullo"},"content":{"rendered":"

XXX, 2, 2020: The Renewal of Hermeneutics: with Paul Ric\u0153ur and Beyond. Edited by Johann Michel and Carla Canullo<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

Buy the electronic version<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

\"copertina-2016-1-fronte\"<\/a>The title of a book that Jean Greisch published in 1985, L\u2019\u00e2ge herm\u00e9neutique de la raison<\/em>, aptly defines the cultural milieu in which Ricoeur\u2019s work developed. At a time when hermeneutics mostly displayed the ontological traits given to it by Heidegger, Ricoeur traced a hermeneutical path that he would describe as the \u201clong way\u201d, since, having started from the hermeneutics of symbols, he had then engaged in a dialogue with the human sciences, history and literature. The many themes tackled by the French philosopher along his intellectual trajectory (epistemology, ontology, politics, ethics, memory, justice\u2026), which constitute the different jalons <\/em>of the long way he opened up, allow us to understand his contribution to philosophy as a \u201cwork in progress\u201d, to use a term that emphasises its fertility. The articles of this issue of \u201cDiscipline filosofiche\u201d, giving centre stage to \u201cthe renewal of hermeneutics with Paul Ricoeur and beyond\u201d, are intended as part of this work in progress. They take up again some issues discussed by Ricoeur, but they also explore territories that are not usually associated with hermeneutics and that Ricoeur himself did not or could not explore, as they did not belong to his time. Those territories he certainly would not have considered as unrelated to Humanity. He would certainly have reoriented his \u201clong way\u201d in their direction, and hermeneutics now allows us to understand and interpret them by carrying forward the renewal he began.
\nRicoeur\u2019s renewal of hermeneutics does not consist only in his rejection of the \u201contological turn\u201d promoted by Heidegger and his disciples, who viewed understanding more as a way of being than as a path to knowledge \u2013 a path followed also by the sciences, especially the so-called \u201chuman sciences\u201d. Ricoeur\u2019s rejection was motivated by the thought that the way of ontological hermeneutics was definitely too short to do justice to the epistemological and methodological issues raised by the sciences. Being open to those issues, Ricoeur renewed hermeneutics by turning it into a hermeneutics of symbols, texts, action, a hermeneutics of the self, of the human being with its own \u201ccapabilities\u201d. Today these issues can be further explored by opening new workshops \u2013 by questioning the \u201cwho\u201d of the interpreter or the revival of hermeneutics as a critical way, a way of semantic innovation, a way that intercepts and focuses on the themes of \u201csuspicion\u201d and the tragic, or even as a way that investigates the vulnerability of the other, human rights and inter-human relationships. In all these fields hermeneutics was renewed with <\/em>Ricoeur, whose concern for a constant dialogue with his time made him attentive to their issues.
\nOur present reality prompts reflections that were not available to Ricoeur, as whole fields unknown to the French philosopher have emerged. Such is the case of the Digital Turn that characterizes our times, which must be understood in terms of its role and value in our own cultural context \u2013 a role and value that prompt us to conceive of the \u201cwho\u201d and Identity as an Online Identity that appears as a \u201cprofile\u201d in the social media. On the other hand, it is no longer possible to ignore the issues raised by the way our environment is currently inhabited and transformed. These new emergencies of reality also contribute to renewing hermeneutics, shaping it into a way that re-interprets the inhabited space and the architecture that constructs it, even to the point of stretching what Ricoeur used to call the \u201carc of the text\u201d: from the text itself to action, and from action to the landscape, intended as that text that is interpreted by geography and that opens up the space for a hermeneutics of the environment that lives up to its challenges.
\nAlthough the challenges Ricoeur faced are not those we are facing today, the \u201cwork in progress\u201d of the \u201clong way\u201d proves capable of interpreting our own time, bringing hermeneutics beyond <\/em>the stage associated with the French philosopher. It proves capable of renewing hermeneutics by enabling it to explain reality more fully, interpreting its hidden folds so as to gain a deeper understanding of it.<\/p>\n

Contents<\/strong>
\n(click on the titles to view the abstracts) <\/span><\/p>\n

Johann Michel, Carla Canullo, Avant-propos. Le renouvellement de l\u2019herm\u00e9neutique ou la continuation de la \u00abvoie longue\u00bb
\nPaul Ric\u0153ur, Concetto e simbolo (a cura di Carla Canullo)
\nJohann Michel, Qui interpr\u00e8te<\/a>?
\nVinicio Busacchi, La via dell\u2019ermeneutica critica<\/a>
\nJean-Fran\u00e7ois Houle, L\u2019Innovation s\u00e9mantique comme pr\u00e9-interpr\u00e9tation ou la fonction herm\u00e9neutique de l\u2019imagination chez Paul Ric\u0153ur<\/a>
\nAnnalisa Caputo, Il Nietzsche di Ric\u0153ur e l\u2019eredit\u00e0 ermeneutica del “sospetto”<\/a>
\nMarco Casucci, Tra filosofia e non-filosofia: i “luoghi” del tragico nell\u2019ermeneutica ric\u0153uriana<\/a>
\nSebastiano Galanti Grollo, Per un\u2019ermeneutica dell\u2019alterit\u00e0: Ric\u0153ur e la vulnerabilit\u00e0 dell\u2019altro<\/a>
\nAlessandro Colleoni, Droits de l\u2019homme et exp\u00e9rience de la vuln\u00e9rabilit\u00e9: Une \u00abhumanit\u00e9\u00bb \u00e0 soigner?<\/a>
\nRenato Boccali, Essere-in-relazione. Ermeneutica dell\u2019agire e poetica del voler vivere insieme in Paul Ric\u0153ur<\/a>
\nLuca Possati, The Rise of the Code and the Hermeneutics of Technology: A Ricoeurian Perspective on Software<\/a>
\nAlberto Romele, Digital Hermeneutics as Hermeneutics of the Self<\/a>
\nChiara Pavan, Come ci raccontiamo oggi? Rappresentazione e vita nella nostra identit\u00e0 online<\/a>
\nFrancesca D\u2019Alessandris, Progettare l\u2019altrove. Considerazioni sul ruolo dell\u2019ermeneutica per un\u2019architettura utopica<\/a>
\nPaolo Furia, Landscape as a Text: Ricoeur and the Human Geography<\/a>
\nMaria Cristina Clorinda Vendra, Interpreting the Natural Environment. Paul Ricoeur\u2019s Directions for an Eco-Hermeneutic Phenomenology<\/a><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

XXX, 2, 2020: The Renewal of Hermeneutics: with Paul Ric\u0153ur and Beyond. Edited by Johann Michel and Carla Canullo Buy the electronic version The title of a book that Jean Greisch published in 1985, L\u2019\u00e2ge herm\u00e9neutique de la raison, aptly defines the cultural milieu in which Ricoeur\u2019s work developed. At a time when hermeneutics mostly …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5494","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ultimi-numeri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5494","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5494"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5494\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5496,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5494\/revisions\/5496"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5494"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5494"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5494"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}