{"id":2597,"date":"2014-03-05T09:55:51","date_gmt":"2014-03-05T08:55:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/?p=2597"},"modified":"2015-05-28T23:08:56","modified_gmt":"2015-05-28T21:08:56","slug":"df-xxii-2-2012-knowledge-and-justification-ed-by-annalisa-coliva-sebastiano-moruzzi-and-giorgio-volpe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/ultimi-numeri\/df-xxii-2-2012-knowledge-and-justification-ed-by-annalisa-coliva-sebastiano-moruzzi-and-giorgio-volpe\/","title":{"rendered":"DF XXII, 2, 2012: Knowledge and Justification. Ed. by Annalisa Coliva, Sebastiano Moruzzi and Giorgio Volpe"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>
Buy the electronic version<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Special Issue of Discipline Filosofiche XXII, 2, 2012:<\/strong>
\nKnowledge and Justification<\/strong>
\nEd. by Annalisa Coliva, Sebastiano Moruzzi and Giorgio Volpe<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>This issue of Discipline filosofiche<\/em> brings together a number of articles on knowledge and epistemic justification that arise from papers presented at the Meeting of the European Epistemology Network that was held in Bologna and Modena in June 2012.The articles that comprise this collection provide only a limited sample of the wide array of issues and themes that were discussed at the conference. But the questions they address are invariably among those that occupy centre stage in the current epistemological debate on knowledge and justification. The first two articles tackle the problem of disagreement. Klemens Kap\u00adpel focuses on deep<\/em> disagreement, that is, difference of opinion about the re\u00adliability of epistemic principles, and discusses the sort of practical problem it raises. On the other hand, Michele Palmira focuses on peer<\/em> disagreement, that is, difference of opinion among epistemic peers, and criticizes some recent attempts to understand this phenomenon in contextualist terms. A second group of papers takes up different aspects of the sceptical challenge to our knowledge claims. Tim Kraft argues that \u201cCartesian\u201d sceptical arguments need not be premised on controversial infallibilist assumptions and reformulates them in a way that avoids two familiar pitfalls. Raban Reich\u00admann develops a version of the sceptical challenge that does not exploit the familiar scenarios usually found in the epistemological literature, but invokes the possibility that we are mistaken in our beliefs for a reason that we cannot even understand. Maria Cristina Amoretti and Nicla Vassal\u00adlo provide a detailed argument to the effect that the three conditions that have been traditionally regarded as necessary for knowledge \u2013 truth, belief and justi\u00adfication \u2013 may be satisfied even in a global sceptical scenario. The other articles address three further issues connected with the subject of knowledge. Ren\u00e9 van Woudenberg focuses on the relationship between will and belief, arguing that the evidence provided by various thought experi\u00adments as well as by empirical psychology unequivocally supports doxastic in\u00advoluntarism. Arturs Logins discusses and neutralizes a number of purported counterexamples to the Reason-Knowledge principle \u2013 a principle relating knowledge to rational action that was first proposed by John Hawthorne and Jason Stanley. Dan O\u2019Brien draws on the insights of virtue epistemol\u00adogy to present a fresh view of Hume\u2019s account of intellectual virtues, cast\u00ading doubts on the adequacy of the usual reductionist portrayal of the Scot\u00adtish philoso\u00adpher\u2019s epistemology of testimony.<\/p>\n

Contents<\/strong><\/p>\n

(Click on the titles to view the abstracts)<\/span><\/p>\n

Annalisa Coliva, Sebastiano Moruzzi and Giorgio Volpe, Guest Editors\u2019 Preface<\/a><\/em>
\n Klemens Kappel, The Problem of Deep Disagreement<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Michele Palmira, A Critique of Contextualist Approaches to Peer Disagreement<\/a><\/em>
\n Tim Kraft, Scepticism, Infallibilism, Fallibilism<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Raban Reichmann, The Unrecognised Error-Possibility and New Sceptical Impetus<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Maria Cristina Amoretti and Nicla Vassallo, Do We Know (Almost) Nothing? Global Scepticism and Justification<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Ren\u00e9 van Woudenberg, Belief is Involuntary: The Evidence from Thought Experiments and Empirical Psychology<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Arturs Logins, Knowledge, Practice, and Merit<\/a><\/em><\/span>
\n Dan O\u2019Brien, Hume and the Intellectual Virtues<\/a><\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Issue on quodlibet edizioni website<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Special Issue of Discipline Filosofiche XXII, 2, 2012: Knowledge and Justification Ed. by Annalisa Coliva, Sebastiano Moruzzi and Giorgio Volpe This issue of Discipline filosofiche brings together a number of articles on knowledge and epistemic justification that arise from papers presented at the Meeting of the European Epistemology Network that was held in Bologna and …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","","category-ultimi-numeri"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2597"}],"version-history":[{"count":31,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2597\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2599,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2597\/revisions\/2599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}