{"id":6472,"date":"2025-07-07T17:07:06","date_gmt":"2025-07-07T15:07:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/?page_id=6472"},"modified":"2025-07-07T17:11:23","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T15:11:23","slug":"discipline-filosofiche-xxxvi-2-2026-foucaults-archaeology-sources-questions-and-legacy-a-cura-di-elisabetta-basso-e-andrea-cavazzini","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/discipline-filosofiche-xxxvi-2-2026-foucaults-archaeology-sources-questions-and-legacy-a-cura-di-elisabetta-basso-e-andrea-cavazzini\/","title":{"rendered":"Discipline Filosofiche, XXXVI, 2, 2026: Foucault\u2019s Archaeology: Sources, Questions and Legacy, ed. by Elisabetta Basso and Andrea Cavazzini"},"content":{"rendered":"

In Michel Foucault\u2019s published and unpublished writings, between Naissance de la Clinique<\/em> (1963) and L\u2019archeologie du savoir<\/em> (1969), the recurrence of the term \u201carchaeology\u201d marks the centrality of this notion in the period when the philosopher\u2019s research stood out in the \u201cstructuralist\u201d intellectual landscape for its binding together of philosophical reflection and historical research.
\nFollowing an analogy that Freud applies to psychoanalysis, archaeology emerges as a historiography of the unthought: that is, as an attempt to reconstruct how what from the past arrives to constitute the present in which we live, without ever having been present in the explicit consciousness of historical agents. Archaeology therefore starts from what is given in the present \u2013 in Foucault’s work, the objects or practices of knowledge \u2013 and traces back the layers of historicity that remain imperceptible to the immediate gaze of those whose actions are shaped through these objects and practices of knowledge.
\nHowever, the title of the chair at the Coll\u00e8ge de France that Foucault came to hold in 1970 \u2013 Histoire des syst\u00e8mes de pens\u00e9e<\/em> \u2013 suggests a more traditional history of philosophy or ideas. And from 1970 onwards, Foucault largely abandons \u201carchaeology\u201d, rendering the term somewhat enigmatic and, in any case, not fully explored in its implications.
\nThe hypothesis animating this special issue is that archaeology, far from being reduced to a stylistic device, constitutes a philosophical concept in its own right, whose meanings and possible developments are not limited to Foucault’s direct reference to it in his works. A decisive factor in the reconfiguration of the relationship between philosophy and historiography (which is far from any philosophy of history in which becoming is crushed under the weight of retrospective awareness), archaeology also implies \u2013 as Enzo Melandri suggested as early as 1968 (La linea e il circolo<\/em>) \u2013 an intention to recover what remains unexpressed or repressed from the past. While in the historical field, this entails the distinction in principle between res gestae<\/em> and historia rerum gestarum<\/em> (between actual events and their appearance in explicit awareness), in the philosophical field the effect of archaeology seems to consist in a therapeutic posture aimed at dissolving the painful \u201ccramps\u201d in the self-consciousness of an epoch or a society.
\nOn the occasion of the centenary of Michel Foucault\u2019s birth and in light of the posthumous publication of numerous unpublished works by the philosopher, this special issue of Discipline Filosofiche<\/em> aims to offer a reflection on the \u201carchaeological\u201d method in philosophy and the history of thought. With this in mind, contributions addressing the following topics are encouraged:
\n1) the relationship between archaeology and historiography;
\n2) Foucauldian archaeology and its sources;
\n3) the archaeological method and phenomenology;
\n4) archaeology and psychoanalysis;
\n5) archaeology and structuralism;
\n6) archaeology and language analysis;
\n7) archaeology and archives;
\n8) archaeology and genealogy;
\n9) the philosophical legacy of Foucault\u2019s concept of archaeology.<\/p>\n

Guidelines for the authors:<\/strong> Submissions should not exceed 9,000 words including abstract, refer-ences and footnotes. Manuscripts may be submitted in Italian, English, French, German, or Spanish. They must be sent as an email attachment in .doc or .docx format, along with a .pdf version, to Elisabetta Basso<\/strong> (elisabetta.basso@unipv.it<\/strong><\/a>) and to Andrea Cavazzini<\/strong> (andreacavazzini78@gmail.com<\/strong><\/a>). Submitted manuscripts will be sent to two independent reviewers, following a double-blind peer review process. The reviewers may ask authors to make changes or improvements to their contributions in view of publication. Authors are kindly requested to attach both an anonymous version of their contribution entitled \u201cManuscript\u201d and a separate \u201cCover Page\u201d stating their name, academic affiliation and contact details. Manuscripts must include an English abstract of less than 150 words and 5 keywords<\/strong>. Any property of the file that might identify the author must be removed to ensure anonymity during the review process. A notification of receipt will be issued for each submission. In drafting their text, authors can adopt any clear and coherent style, but should the text be accepted for publication, they will be required to send a final version in keeping with the style guidelines of the journal (please refer to the style guidelines at https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/norme-redazionali\/<\/strong><\/a>). Submission of a manuscript is understood to imply that the paper has not been published before and that it is not being considered for publication by any other journal.<\/strong> Should the manuscript be accepted for publication, the author will be required to transfer copyrights to the University of Bologna. Requests to republish the article may be made to the Editorial Board of the Journal.<\/p>\n

Deadline for the submission of manuscripts: June 15, 2026<\/strong>
\nNotification of acceptance, conditional acceptance, or rejection: August 31, 2026<\/strong>
\nDeadline for the submission of the final draft: October 15, 2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

.","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In Michel Foucault\u2019s published and unpublished writings, between Naissance de la Clinique (1963) and L\u2019archeologie du savoir (1969), the recurrence of the term \u201carchaeology\u201d marks the centrality of this notion in the period when the philosopher\u2019s research stood out in the \u201cstructuralist\u201d intellectual landscape for its binding together of philosophical reflection and historical research. Following …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001012,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-6472","page","type-page","status-publish",""],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001012"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6472"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6478,"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/6472\/revisions\/6478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.disciplinefilosofiche.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}